Le
Sens de la Marche (The Way to Go) – 1953
by
Arthur Adamov
(Summary)
The
play unfolds in a strange, confined world where everyday logic seems to have
slipped out of place. At its center is a group of individuals caught in a
system they neither fully understand nor control. Life moves forward, but not
with clarity—only with a vague, uneasy sense that something is expected of
them, though no one can quite define what that is.
The
characters exist under the watchful presence of authority figures who impose
rules that appear arbitrary and shifting. Orders are given, but they are often
unclear or contradictory. Despite this confusion, the individuals feel
compelled to obey. There is a constant pressure to “move forward,” to follow
“the way,” though no one knows where that way leads or why it must be followed.
Among
the group, one senses growing anxiety and frustration. Conversations circle
endlessly, filled with attempts to understand their situation. Questions
arise—What is the purpose of their actions? Why must they comply?—but answers
never come. Instead, the dialogue often dissolves into repetition, hesitation,
and silence, reflecting the characters’ inability to grasp their reality.
At
times, the authority figures step in more forcefully, reinforcing the need for
order and compliance. They speak with certainty, even when what they demand
makes little sense. Their presence deepens the atmosphere of control, leaving
the others feeling even more powerless. Some characters try to resist
internally, questioning the system, but their resistance rarely translates into
action. Fear, confusion, and habit keep them in place.
As
the play progresses, the sense of direction becomes even more uncertain. The
idea of “the way to go” remains central, yet it grows increasingly abstract.
The characters continue moving—physically or metaphorically—but their movement
feels empty, as if they are trapped in a cycle rather than progressing toward a
destination.
Moments
of tension arise when individuals attempt to assert themselves or break from
the pattern, but these moments are short-lived. The structure surrounding them
absorbs or neutralizes any attempt at change. The group dynamic shifts slightly
at times, with alliances forming and dissolving, yet no real transformation
occurs.
By
the later stages of the play, the atmosphere becomes heavier. The characters
appear more resigned, their earlier questioning replaced by a kind of weary
acceptance. The system persists, unchanged and unchallenged in any meaningful
way. Movement continues, but without purpose or resolution.
The
play closes without a clear conclusion. The characters remain within the same
uncertain framework, still following “the way,” still searching for meaning
that never fully reveals itself. The sense of direction that the title promises
remains elusive, leaving their journey incomplete and ongoing.

0 Comments