Cascando (1962)
by Samuel Beckett
(Type of Work)
Type of Work
Samuel Beckett’s Cascando (1962) is a highly
experimental work that defies conventional classification, occupying a unique
space between theatre, poetry, and musical composition. It is neither a
traditional play with a linear plot nor a conventional narrative in prose or
verse. Rather, it is a dramatic meditation on language, sound, and the
impossibility of closure, making it a quintessential example of Beckett’s late,
minimalist style.
At its core, Cascando is an experimental play, often
categorized under the genre of “radio drama” or “spoken-word theatre,” though
these labels capture only part of its essence. The work consists of three main
figures: the Voice, the Reader, and the Listener. The Voice attempts to tell a
story, but repeatedly fails to reach a conventional ending. The Reader follows
and echoes fragments of the Voice’s speech, while the Listener silently
receives the words. The interactions among these figures are less concerned
with dramatic action than with sound, rhythm, and the musicality of language,
making the play almost a hybrid between spoken theatre and musical composition.
In terms of structure, Cascando can be seen as a
theatrical poem or a verbal symphony. Beckett himself emphasized the musical
dimension of the work, instructing performers to treat the text rhythmically,
with careful attention to pauses, inflections, and the layering of voices.
Unlike traditional drama, which relies on plot, character development, and
stage action, Cascando focuses on process over resolution, exploring the
tension between the desire to complete a story and the inherent limitations of
language. This positions it within Beckett’s broader oeuvre, which consistently
interrogates the boundaries of communication and the human condition.
Additionally, Cascando reflects elements of absurdist
theatre, a movement with which Beckett is closely associated. Absurdist works
typically depict the futility of human endeavor and the breakdown of
conventional meaning, and Cascando exemplifies this through its refusal to
provide a coherent narrative or clear resolution. The play is less about “what
happens” and more about the act of attempting, the struggle to articulate, and
the ephemeral nature of expression itself.
In conclusion, Cascando is best understood as a hybrid,
avant-garde work that combines elements of drama, poetry, and music. It is a
play without traditional plot or action, a verbal composition that emphasizes
rhythm, repetition, and the impossibility of narrative closure. As such, it
challenges audiences to reconsider the very nature of theatre and storytelling,
making it a landmark work in twentieth-century experimental literature.

0 Comments