Rough for Theatre I (Fragment de théâtre I, written c.
late 1950s, published 1979)
by Samuel Beckett
(Key Facts)
Key Facts — Rough for Theatre I by Samuel Beckett
Full Title
Rough for Theatre I (French: Fragment de théâtre I)
Author
Samuel Beckett
Type of Work
Dramatic fragment / short experimental play
Genre
Absurdist drama; late-modernist minimalist theatre;
anti-theatre
Language
Originally written in French; later translated into
English by Samuel Beckett
Time and Place Written
Late 1950s; written primarily in Paris, France
Date of First Publication
1979 (posthumous publication)
Publisher
Les Éditions de Minuit (French); later English editions
by Faber & Faber / Grove Press in collected plays
Tone
Bleak, austere, ironic, existential, restrained
Setting (Time)
Indeterminate; outside historical or chronological time
(a perpetual present)
Setting (Place)
An undefined, empty theatrical space with no
identifiable features
Protagonist
A (in relational terms, A and B together function as a
dual or composite protagonist)
Major Conflict
The desire for movement and progress versus physical
immobility and mutual dependence
Rising Action
A repeatedly urges movement; B delays or resists
cooperation, intensifying frustration and exposing dependence
Climax
The attempted movement itself—when cooperation briefly
occurs but reveals the futility and meaninglessness of progress
Falling Action
Fatigue, cessation of effort, and a return to stasis
Resolution
None; the fragment ends without closure, mirroring the
unresolved condition of existence
Themes
Human interdependence as entrapment
Illusion of autonomy and agency
Movement versus immobility
Power through passivity
Futility of action
Existence as endurance rather than achievement
Incompleteness and fragmentation
Motifs
Attempted and aborted movement
Delay and hesitation
Repetition of speech and action
Silence versus speech
Physical limitation
Symbols
The crippled body: existential limitation
The wheelchair: conditional, dependent mobility
The stick: artificial support and fragile balance
The empty stage: existential void
Fragmentary structure: incompleteness of being
Foreshadowing
The repeated failure and hesitation surrounding
movement foreshadow the inevitable return to stasis and the absence of resolution;
early delays anticipate the play’s final immobility and abrupt ending.

0 Comments