Ill Seen Ill Said (Mal vu mal dit, 1981)
by Samuel Beckett
(Summary)
There is an old woman. She is alone. She lives
somewhere in a bleak, grey world, neither fully remembered nor entirely
present, on the edge of perception. The air is still, the landscape is pale,
the sky is dull. She moves slowly, her thoughts hovering between the present
and the fading shadows of memory. Her body is frail, her mind often lost in
fragments, glimpses of things half-seen, half-understood.
She sits and she looks, and in her looking, the world
appears, or perhaps she imagines it into being. Sometimes she sees a shape, a
mound, a house, or a hill. Sometimes she hears a sound, a creaking, a shifting,
a footstep that might be her own. Yet nothing is clear; all is blurred at the
edges, as if the world itself refuses to be fully grasped. She tries to name
it, to fix it in words, but the words come wrong, stumble, misrepresent. Mal vu
mal dit—ill seen, ill said.
Her thoughts wander to other lives, to other women who
may have been like her, or perhaps are echoes of herself. She recalls moments
that might be memories or inventions. There is a sense of routine, a rhythm in
her day, yet no action truly unfolds. She moves through rooms, through
corridors of her mind, past objects she barely remembers owning, past
landscapes she cannot quite place. Everything is distant and intimate all at
once.
Loneliness surrounds her. It is not only the absence of
people but the impossibility of connection, the inability of her mind and body
to fully encounter anything. And yet she persists, aware of her own perception,
aware that she is seeing poorly, speaking poorly, but still compelled to see,
to speak. The world is always just out of reach, and she reaches, fumbling,
striving, misnaming, misremembering.
Beckett’s narrative follows her in fragments, jumping
from image to reflection, from present observation to blurred memory. There are
no plot twists, no dialogue to anchor events—only the persistent motion of
consciousness. The reader is drawn into the rhythm of her experience: the
flicker of thought, the repetition of gestures, the faint glimmers of the
outside world intruding on her solitude.
In the end, there is no grand resolution, no
revelation. The woman remains in her place, in her world of partial vision and
fractured language. Yet in this incompleteness lies the profound truth of
Beckett’s story: that life is always a struggle to see clearly, to express what
is barely perceptible, to inhabit the fragile boundary between presence and absence,
sense and nonsense. She persists because she must, and in that persistence, the
ordinary act of perceiving—however flawed—becomes both a struggle and a form of
quiet heroism.
The story closes not with closure but with continuity:
the woman still sits, still sees, still speaks poorly of what she sees, and the
world continues to exist, in all its half-seen, half-said obscurity.

0 Comments