The
Comparison
by
John Donne
(Poem, Summary, Paraphrase, Analysis & Questions)
The
Comparison
As
the sweet sweat of roses in a still,
As
that which from chafed musk-cat's pores doth trill,
As
the almighty balm of th' early East,
Such
are the sweat drops of my mistress' breast,
And
on her neck her skin such lustre sets,
They
envy her the white Arabian frets.
Her
breath is more sweet than a gentle Southwest wind,
That
comes to woo the flowers, and takes the scent behind.
My
mistress, when she goes, is like a spring
That
leaves a lusher world than it finds,
Not
like the spring that only brings
The
smell of rottenness and slime from ditches and blind ponds.
But
here’s the hard contrast—
A
thing which no ease can redress:
Her
body is as foul as a common road,
Which
all corrupts that doth it loads.
As
in a dungeon, darkness doth succeed
The
stealing light, with dreadful speed;
So
doth thy face,
Clutch
all beauty and all grace.
Thy
breath is like a chain of frogs,
Thy
voice as broken as untempered clogs.
Thy
limbs do but obey thy face's laws—
And
scabs and leprosy deface thy jaws.
Thou
art not worth the hanging of a dog
That
hath been flayed.
This
poem is a satirical and erotic elegy, blending admiration with brutal mockery.
Donne juxtaposes a mistress of refined beauty with another of repulsive
appearance and demeanor, employing stark contrasts, exotic imagery, and bodily
metaphors—typical of his metaphysical style.
Summary
The
speaker begins the poem by praising the physical beauty of his mistress. He
uses a series of rich and exotic comparisons to describe her:
Her
sweat is compared to the fragrant scent of roses in a still room, or the musk
that seeps from a musk-cat’s skin.
He
likens her to the balm of the East, a precious and aromatic substance,
emphasizing her sweetness and rarity.
Her
neck glows with such radiance that even white Arabian pearls seem dull by
comparison.
Her
breath is more delightful than the soft southwest wind that woos flowers and
carries away their fragrance.
When
she walks, she’s like a springtime that enriches everything it touches, unlike
the spring that might bring rot and decay from stagnant water.
After
establishing this idealized image of his mistress, the speaker shifts
dramatically to describe another woman, using grotesque and degrading imagery.
This second woman serves as a contrast to his beloved:
Her
body is compared to a filthy road that is corrupted by everything that passes
over it.
Her
presence is like darkness suddenly replacing light in a dungeon, suggesting she
brings an overwhelming ugliness.
Her
face is so unpleasant that it overpowers and destroys any beauty or charm.
Her
breath is likened to the croaking of frogs, and her voice is described as
broken and unpleasant, like badly made shoes.
Her
body and limbs are just as unattractive as her face; her jaws are disfigured
with scabs and signs of disease, possibly leprosy.
The
speaker concludes this cruel contrast by saying she is less valuable than a
skinned dog, unfit even to be hung.
The
poem ends on this severe note, having painted one woman with rich, sensual
beauty and the other with shocking physical repulsiveness—offering a stark and
vivid side-by-side comparison of the two.
Line-by-line
Paraphrase
1.
As the sweet sweat of roses in a still,
→
Like the delicate fragrance of roses in a closed room,
2.
As that which from chafed musk-cat’s pores doth trill,
→
Like the scent that comes out from the rubbed skin of a musk-cat,
3.
As the almighty balm of th’ early East,
→
Like the powerful and costly balm from the East,
4.
Such are the sweat drops of my mistress’ breast,
→
That’s how sweet the sweat is on my mistress’s chest.
5.
And on her neck her skin such lustre sets,
→ Her
skin shines so brightly on her neck,
6.
They envy her the white Arabian frets.
→
Even the famous white Arabian pearls envy her skin’s glow.
7.
Her breath is more sweet than a gentle Southwest wind,
→ Her
breath smells sweeter than a soft southwest breeze,
8.
That comes to woo the flowers, and takes the scent behind.
→ The
kind of breeze that kisses flowers and carries their fragrance away.
9.
My mistress, when she goes, is like a spring
→
When my mistress walks, she’s
like the season of spring,
10.
That leaves a lusher world than it finds,
→ She
makes everything more beautiful than it was before.
11.
Not like the spring that only brings
→ Not
like the kind of spring that just brings
12.
The smell of rottenness and slime from ditches and blind ponds.
→ The
foul smell of decay and slime from stagnant ditches and ponds.
(From
this point on, the speaker begins describing the other woman harshly.)
13.
But here’s the hard contrast—
→ But
now let me show you the big difference—
14.
A thing which no ease can redress:
→
Something so bad, no comfort can fix it.
15.
Her body is as foul as a common road,
→ Her
body is as filthy as a well-used road,
16.
Which all corrupts that doth it loads.
→
Which spoils everything that touches or travels over it.
17.
As in a dungeon, darkness doth succeed
→
Like in a dark prison, where light quickly disappears,
18.
The stealing light, with dreadful speed;
→
Darkness takes over the fading light very quickly;
19.
So doth thy face,
→ The
same happens with your face,
20.
Clutch all beauty and all grace.
→ It
grabs and destroys any trace of beauty or grace.
21.
Thy breath is like a chain of frogs,
→
Your breath sounds like the croaking of frogs one after another,
22.
Thy voice as broken as untempered clogs.
→
Your voice is rough and broken, like poorly made wooden shoes.
23.
Thy limbs do but obey thy face’s laws—
→ The
rest of your body is just as ugly as your face,
24.
And scabs and leprosy deface thy jaws.
→ And
your jaws are covered in scabs and show signs of leprosy.
25.
Thou art not worth the hanging of a dog
→ You’re not even worth the value of a dead
dog
26.
That hath been flayed.
→ One
that has had its skin stripped off.
Analysis
in Detail
“Elegy:
The Comparison” is a bold and provocative metaphysical poem in which John Donne
sets up a stark contrast between two women—one beautiful, sensual, and admired;
the other grotesque, repulsive, and mocked. The poem showcases Donne’s talent
for dramatic contrasts, extended metaphors, and vivid sensory imagery, with a
tone that shifts from romantic and adoring to sarcastic and brutal. It is one
of Donne’s most controversial elegies due to its unflinching use of physical
imagery and its shocking, even cruel, tone.
Tone
and Structure:
The
poem is essentially divided into two halves:
Lines
1–12: Praise of the speaker’s mistress using luxurious, exotic, and sensual
metaphors.
Lines
13–26: A scathing description of another woman, using grotesque and
dehumanizing imagery.
The
tone shifts sharply in the middle. It begins with admiration, awe, and
reverence, then quickly turns into biting satire and ridicule. This jarring
contrast gives the poem its power and memorability.
Use
of Imagery and Metaphor:
Donne
is a master of metaphysical conceits—extended, often bizarre comparisons that
are intellectually clever and emotionally charged. In the first half, the
speaker describes his mistress’s bodily attributes using imagery drawn from:
Nature
and luxury (e.g., “sweet sweat of roses,” “musk-cat,” “balm of the East”)
Jewels
and fragrance (“white Arabian frets,” “gentle southwest wind”)
These
comparisons elevate the woman to an almost mythic status, aligning her beauty
with richness, sweetness, and the regenerative power of spring.
In
contrast, the second woman is depicted using ugly, revolting imagery:
A
“common road” walked by many
A
“dungeon” overtaken by darkness
“Breath
like a chain of frogs,” “scabs,” and “leprosy”
This
shift in imagery is more than just insulting—it’s symbolic. The speaker likens
her not to natural beauty but to disease, dirt, and corruption. His metaphors
not only degrade her physical appearance but attack her very being.
Themes:
Ideal
vs. Reality / Beauty vs. Ugliness
The
poem dramatically contrasts two extremes of female physicality and presence.
One is the idealized vision of sensual beauty, the other the exaggerated horror
of ugliness. The ideal is described with love and reverence; the opposite is
described with disgust and scorn.
Objectification
and Bodily Focus
Donne
unabashedly objectifies both women, reducing them to their physical attributes.
The focus on bodily details—sweat, breath, skin, and voice—reveals a concern
with sensual experience and physical judgment. It reflects a Renaissance-era
tension between spiritual love and carnal desire.
Cruelty
and Satirical Wit
The
poem’s second half is saturated with cruelty. But this cruelty is not
random—it’s a witty attack, likely exaggerated for comic and rhetorical effect.
The humor is dark and biting, designed to mock not just a woman, but perhaps
the very idea of conventional poetic praise.
Language
and Style:
Donne’s
language is intentionally rich and textured in the first section—evocative and
sweet-sounding. His use of alliteration, rhythm, and soft vowels enhances the
musicality. The words feel lush, slow, and indulgent, mimicking the pleasure he
associates with his mistress.
In
the second section, the diction becomes harsh, abrupt, and ugly. Harsh
consonants, clunky metaphors, and grotesque descriptions shift the rhythm and
feel of the poem. It becomes almost violent, reinforcing the speaker’s
emotional repulsion.
Perspective
and Intention:
The
speaker may be read as a mocking courtier, making a public performance of
preference, or as a lover justifying his affection for one woman by cruelly
demeaning another. Either way, the poem is performative and exaggerated. The
grotesque satire might reflect more on the speaker’s judgmental tone than on
the reality of the women themselves.
It
is also possible that Donne is mocking traditional poetic forms. By taking the
typical “comparison of women” found in Renaissance love poetry to absurd and
vulgar extremes, he may be critiquing the way women are praised or condemned
based solely on appearance.
Historical
and Literary Context:
Written
during the late 16th or early 17th century, this poem is part of Donne’s
“Elegies”, which often broke social and poetic conventions. The metaphysical
poets, including Donne, favored startling imagery, philosophical reflection,
and dramatic monologue.
“Elegy:
The Comparison” would have shocked many of Donne’s contemporaries with its
earthy and graphic descriptions. Yet it also reflects the wit and intellectual
daring that was valued among certain elite literary circles.
Conclusion:
“Elegy:
The Comparison” is a poem of contrast, satire, and sensuality. With biting wit
and vivid imagery, Donne elevates one woman to almost divine beauty while
dragging another into the mud of physical disgust. The poem’s genius lies in
its language and form—its bold use of metaphysical conceit, tonal contrast, and
provocative content. Though it may seem cruel by modern standards, it reflects
a poetic culture fascinated by paradox, intensity, and emotional extremes.
Possible
Exam Questions
Who
is the speaker comparing in “Elegy: The Comparison”?
Mention
two metaphors used to describe the speaker’s mistress.
What
does Donne compare the second woman’s breath to?
What
is the tone shift in the poem, and where does it occur?
Why
does Donne refer to “white Arabian frets”?
What
does the speaker say about the second woman’s voice?
What
is the meaning of “Her body is as foul as a common road”?
How
does Donne describe the effect of the mistress’s presence on her surroundings?
Describe
the contrasting imagery used in “Elegy: The Comparison.”
How
does Donne use metaphysical conceits in the poem?
In
what way is this elegy different from traditional love poetry?
Discuss
the theme of beauty and ugliness in Donne’s poem.
What
role does satire play in “Elegy: The Comparison”?
Comment
on Donne’s use of sensory imagery in the first half of the poem.
Analyze
the structure and tone of John Donne’s “Elegy: The Comparison.” How do they
contribute to the overall effect of the poem?
Examine
the use of metaphors and conceits in “Elegy: The Comparison” and how they
reflect Donne’s metaphysical style.
How
does Donne contrast sensual beauty and physical repulsiveness in the poem?
Discuss with reference to imagery and language.
To
what extent can “Elegy: The Comparison” be seen as a satire on Renaissance
ideals of beauty and poetic tradition?
Discuss
the poem as an example of John Donne’s bold and unconventional approach to love
poetry.
Is
the speaker’s harsh treatment of the second woman justified within the context
of the poem? Why or why not?
How
does Donne manipulate the reader’s emotional response through his use of
contrast?
Can
“Elegy: The Comparison” be read as a critique of objectification in love
poetry? Justify your view.
Consider
the speaker’s voice in the poem. Is he sincere or ironic? Give evidence from
the text.
0 Comments