Holy Sonnet IX If poisonous minerals, and if that tree
by
John Donne
(Poem, Summary, Paraphrase, Analysis & Questions)
If
poisonous minerals, and if that tree
If
poisonous minerals, and if that tree
Whose
fruit threw death on (else immortal) us,
If
lecherous goats, if serpents envious
Cannot
be damned, alas, why should I be?
Why
should intent or reason, born in me,
Make
sins, else equal, in me more heinous?
And
Mercy being easy, and glorious
To
God, in his stern wrath, why threatens he?
But
who am I, that dare dispute with thee,
O
God? Oh! of thine only worthy blood,
And
my tears, make a heavenly Lethean flood,
And
drown in it my sins’ black memory.
That
thou remember them, some claim as debt;
I
think it mercy if thou wilt forget.
Summary
Lines
1–2:
“If
poisonous minerals, and if that tree / Whose fruit threw death on (else
immortal) us,”
The
speaker begins by pointing out that poisonous minerals and the biblical Tree of
Knowledge—whose fruit caused the fall of man—exist and have caused harm or
death to humanity. Despite this, they are not condemned or damned.
Lines
3–4:
“If
lecherous goats, if serpents envious / Cannot be damned, alas, why should I
be?”
He
continues by mentioning lustful animals like goats and envious creatures like
serpents. These creatures, which commit behaviors that mirror human sins, are
not held morally accountable or damned. So, he questions why he, a human being,
should be damned for similar traits.
Lines
5–6:
“Why
should intent or reason, born in me, / Make sins, else equal, in me more
heinous?”
The
speaker wonders why his capacity for reason and intention, which are part of
his human nature, make his sins more serious than those of animals or objects.
If the actions are similar, why are they worse just because he has
understanding or intent?
Lines
7–8:
“And
Mercy being easy, and glorious / To God, in his stern wrath, why threatens he?”
He
observes that mercy is both natural and glorious for God. So, he questions why
God, who is capable of showing mercy so freely, also expresses stern wrath and
threatens punishment.
Lines
9–10:
“But
who am I, that dare dispute with thee, / O God?”
Here,
the speaker suddenly pulls back and humbly acknowledges that he is in no
position to question or argue with God. This marks a shift from questioning to
submission.
Lines
11–12:
“Oh!
of thine only worthy blood, / And my tears, make a heavenly Lethean flood,”
He
pleads with God to use Christ’s blood (referred to as the “only worthy blood”)
and the speaker’s own tears of repentance to create a symbolic “Lethean flood.”
(Lethe is a river in Greek mythology whose waters cause forgetfulness.)
Line
13:
“And
drown in it my sins’ black memory.”
The
speaker asks that this Lethean flood wash away and erase the memory of his sins
completely.
Line
14:
“That
thou remember them, some claim as debt; / I think it mercy if thou wilt
forget.”
He
concludes by acknowledging that some may believe God should remember sins as
debts to be repaid. But he feels that it would be an act of mercy for God to
simply forget his sins.
Line-by-line
Paraphrase
1.
If poisonous minerals, and if that tree
If
deadly substances like poisonous minerals, and even the tree
2.
Whose fruit threw death on (else immortal) us,
Whose
fruit brought death upon us, though we were meant to live forever,
3.
If lecherous goats, if serpents envious
If
lustful animals like goats and jealous creatures like snakes
4.
Cannot be damned, alas, why should I be?
Cannot
be punished eternally—then why should I be condemned?
5.
Why should intent or reason, born in me,
Why
should my ability to intend or reason (which I was born with)
6.
Make sins, else equal, in me more heinous?
Make
sins that are similar to those of animals even worse in me?
7.
And Mercy being easy, and glorious
And
since mercy comes naturally and beautifully to God,
8.
To God, in his stern wrath, why threatens he?
Why
does He still threaten us so fiercely in His anger?
9.
But who am I, that dare dispute with thee,
But
who am I to argue with You,
10.
O God?
O
God?
11.
Oh! of thine only worthy blood,
Oh!
By the blood of Jesus Christ, the only blood worthy of redemption,
12.
And my tears, make a heavenly Lethean flood,
And
with my tears, create a divine river like Lethe (that causes forgetting),
13.
And drown in it my sins’ black memory.
And
wash away and forget the dark memory of my sins in it.
14.
That thou remember them, some claim as debt; / I think it mercy if thou wilt
forget.
Some
people say You should remember sins as debts to be repaid;
But
I believe it's Your mercy if You choose to forget them.
Analysis
in Detail
This
sonnet is a deeply introspective and theological meditation where John Donne,
torn between guilt and hope, pleads with God for mercy. He uses rhetorical
questioning, rich biblical and mythological references, and theological
reasoning to highlight human frailty and divine grace. The central conflict is
moral and spiritual: why should humans, especially those capable of remorse, be
damned when nature—filled with destructive and sinful elements—escapes such
judgment?
Lines
1–4: The Argument from Nature and Innocence
If
poisonous minerals, and if that tree / Whose fruit threw death on (else
immortal) us,
If
lecherous goats, if serpents envious / Cannot be damned, alas, why should I be?
Donne
begins with a logical argument, building a case for mercy. He points to
inanimate and animal entities—poisonous minerals, the tree of knowledge, goats,
serpents—that are either dangerous or symbols of sin. Yet, they are not held
morally accountable.
The
tree is a biblical reference to the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil,
whose fruit caused the fall of humanity in Genesis.
Goats
and serpents are traditionally symbols of lust and envy—two deadly sins.
These
creatures are not sentient in the moral sense—they act by instinct or nature,
and so are not damned.
Donne’s
question is both desperate and defiant: why is he, a rational being who didn’t
choose his fallen nature, subject to damnation?
Lines
5–6: The Burden of Reason and Moral Consciousness
Why
should intent or reason, born in me, / Make sins, else equal, in me more
heinous?
Here,
Donne deepens his argument. His possession of reason and moral awareness,
supposedly gifts from God, only make his sins more serious. That is, he is
damned because he knows right from wrong, while animals are not.
This
line exposes the paradox of human existence: the very qualities that elevate us
(reason, intent) also condemn us, because they make us accountable.
It
reflects the Augustinian view of sin—that sin arises not merely from action but
from willful intention.
Lines
7–8: The Nature of God’s Mercy and Wrath
And
Mercy being easy, and glorious / To God, in his stern wrath, why threatens he?
Donne
now shifts focus from humanity’s nature to God’s nature. He contends that mercy
is part of God's essence—it’s not only easy for God to be merciful, it
glorifies Him.
So
why, Donne asks, does God still show “stern wrath” and issue threats of
damnation?
This
is a theologically bold question. Donne walks the line between reverence and
audacity—questioning God's justice while acknowledging His power.
It
mirrors the biblical language of the Psalms and Job, where people cry out in
suffering yet do not lose faith.
Lines
9–10: The Turn – Submission to Divine Authority
But
who am I, that dare dispute with thee, / O God?
This
line marks the volta—the traditional “turn” in a sonnet—where the speaker’s
tone and argument shift.
Donne
catches himself. After all his bold reasoning and moral questioning, he pulls
back in humility, recognizing his smallness before God. This sudden submission
suggests awe, repentance, and faith—a key part of the poem’s spiritual
movement.
It
also echoes Romans 9:20: “But who are you, a human being, to talk back to God?”
Lines
11–13: The Plea for Redemption and Forgetfulness
Oh!
of thine only worthy blood, / And my tears, make a heavenly Lethean flood, /
And drown in it my sins’ black memory.
Having
surrendered intellectually, Donne now appeals emotionally and theologically. He
begs God to mix:
Christ’s
blood (“only worthy blood”)—a reference to the atonement of Jesus, which
Christians believe cleanses sin.
His
own tears—a symbol of genuine repentance.
He
asks that these combine into a “Lethean flood”—a reference to the River Lethe
in Greek mythology, which causes forgetfulness in the afterlife. Donne wants
this divine mixture to wash away the memory of his sins, not only from his own
mind but from God's judgment.
This
is profound: he is not only asking for forgiveness, but for divine
forgetfulness—a deeper form of mercy.
Line
14: The Closing Thought on Mercy and Judgment
That
thou remember them, some claim as debt; / I think it mercy if thou wilt forget.
In
the final couplet, Donne acknowledges a common theological idea: God remembers
sins as debts, to be repaid in judgment.
But
Donne takes a bold stance—he declares that true mercy lies not in settling
accounts, but in forgetting the debts altogether. This echoes scriptures like
Isaiah 43:25: “I, even I, am he who blots out your transgressions... and
remembers your sins no more.”
The
poem ends not in argument, but in grace-filled hope.
Themes
in the Poem
Justice
vs. Mercy: The speaker explores divine justice and pleads for mercy,
questioning traditional ideas of sin and punishment.
Human
Accountability: Donne wrestles with the burden of being a rational, moral
being.
Sin
and Redemption: The poem is ultimately a plea for salvation through Christ and
personal repentance.
Humility
Before God: Despite his questioning, Donne submits to God’s authority.
Divine
Forgetfulness: The desire for not just forgiveness, but for sins to be
completely erased from memory.
Tone
and Style
The
tone shifts from argumentative and frustrated to humble and repentant.
Donne
uses rhetorical questions, metaphysical imagery, and religious allusions to
probe deep spiritual concerns.
His
style is characteristic of the Metaphysical Poets: intellectually complex,
emotionally intense, and rich in paradox.
Possible
Exam Questions
What
is the central question posed by the speaker in the opening lines of the
sonnet?
Why
does Donne mention “poisonous minerals” and “that tree” in the poem?
How
does Donne contrast humans with animals in terms of sin and punishment?
What
is the significance of the reference to “Lethean flood”?
What
does Donne ask God to do with his sins in the final lines?
Explain
the role of reason and intent in making human sin more severe, according to the
poem.
Why
does the speaker stop questioning God midway through the sonnet?
Q.
Read the following lines and answer the questions that follow:
“Why
should intent or reason, born in me,
Make
sins, else equal, in me more heinous?”
What
does the speaker mean by “sins, else equal”?
How
does human reason affect moral responsibility in the poem?
What
theological concern is raised here?
Q.
Read the following lines and answer:
“Oh!
of thine only worthy blood,
And
my tears, make a heavenly Lethean flood,
And
drown in it my sins’ black memory.”
What
is meant by “only worthy blood”?
Explain
the metaphor of the “Lethean flood.”
How
does this passage reflect Donne’s idea of salvation?
Discuss
the use of religious and classical imagery in Holy Sonnet IX.
How
does Donne present the tension between divine justice and divine mercy in the
poem?
Analyze
the structure and progression of thought in the sonnet.
What
role does humility play in the latter part of the poem?
Examine
the significance of the speaker’s repentance in the poem.
Critically
analyze John Donne’s Holy Sonnet IX as a metaphysical exploration of sin,
guilt, and redemption.
How
does Donne employ paradox and rhetorical questions to challenge traditional
theological ideas in Holy Sonnet IX?
Explore
the spiritual journey of the speaker in If poisonous minerals. How does Donne
move from defiance to submission?
“The
poem is a dramatic monologue of a soul in turmoil.” Discuss this statement with
reference to Holy Sonnet IX.
In what ways does the poem reflect Donne’s characteristic metaphysical style?
0 Comments